Sunday, April 3, 2011


date: Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:51 AM
subject: Where's the darn NATURALIZATION FORM?


Okay "" what gives? WND says you are supposed to have a proof
that Mrs. Trump (Sr.) became a naturalized citizen 4 years prior to Donald
Trump being born... the exact quote is, WND: "*Now the website, which has been among those questioning Obama's eligibility, reports that Trump's mother did indeed become a U.S. citizen before the birth of Donald. It displays a small image of a signed naturalization receipt for Mrs. Trump on March 10, 1942, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, four years before Donald was born."
The WND article today is entitled:
"Now look who's getting grilled over eligibility"

I excitedly searched your webpage for the promised "naturalization" form of
his mother but it is not there! Could it be on a different page?

And too, your math is wrong. 9% is not 9 out of 10, it is 9 out of 100. I
guess they could call 9% (9 out of 100) of the populace NOT CONSENTING to
the demands of the Majority is insignificant but still discrimination is

At anyrate, Mrs. Trump Sr does appear to have been born in Scotland
according to the BC, but the matter needs to be determined if SHE HAD BEEN
NATURALIZED BEFORE HIS BIRTH! Do you have those naturalization records or

Edward C. Noonan

to: "Edward C. Noonan"
date: Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:14 PM
subject: Re: Where's the darn NATURALIZATION FORM?

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:14 PM, wrote:

What you are looking at Mr. Noonan is the stub that was attached to her
naturalization form. This stub receipt is much like the stub found on the
side of business checks. The actual certificate was torn off and the stub
remained as an official court document. This stub receipt comes from the
national archives of the United States. This originally appeared in

If you read what was written 9% of Americans believe Obama has produced
sufficient to proof to have shown he is qualified to be President, 90% or
9 out of 10 do not.


from: Edward C. Noonan
date: Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:05 PM
subject: Re: Where's the darn NATURALIZATION FORM?

Dear :

Thank you for your quick response.

I have reviewed the NATURALIZATION card from your link and can now 100% agree that this seems to be legitimate internet proof of the NATURAL BORN CITIZENSHIP of Donald Trump. It was hard to read via your webpage, but WND re-did their article and now a clear image appears there.

And until proven bogus, I accept this as 100% genuine. Thank you for posting this on your webpage. It will help quell the obots and trolls that desire to vet Trump, but refuse to vet their own illegal alien. Trump seems to pass the NATURAL BORN CITIZEN mandate of ART II whereas Mr. Soetoro (aka BHO) does NOT!

I do however, still have unanswered questions - - even after re-examining the sources for the survey. I do see that you quote the WND article accurately that "only 9% of Americans believe Obama has sufficiently proved his eligibility." but their other quote was 9 out of 10 do not believe he does not qualify. I don't know how WND or you arrived at that conclusion? Perhaps they draw it from question 2? (is there another poll? Here are the first 5 questions of the WND/Wentzel poll survey and the responses:

1. Are you aware of questions raised about Barack Obama's constitutional eligibility for the office of president?

My Comment: I am amazed that 76.8% of everyone questioned in this survey ACTUALLY HAS HEARD of this Art II Constitutional question. This really blows my mind! The conclusion that you would draw from this, that if you walked down the street...7 or 8 of every 10 people would actually have heard of the matter! OUTSTANDING! There may be hope for America yet!

2. What is your view of lingering questions about Obama’s eligibility to be President?

My Comment: This is almost a party-line question. 41.2% (32.1 + 9.1) of Dems/GOP/ Independents want the question to go away, and then 49.8% (41.9 + 7.9) of Dems/GOP/ and Independents are troubled or feel it is an important question. I am not sure how WND got 9 out of 10 but the stats here say different.

3. President Obama has refused to release his educational records, which could prove or disprove whether or not he was born in the United States as required by the Constitution. What is your opinion of the fact Obama has not released his educational records?

My Comment: This one is pretty damaging to Soetoro as well. Here it shows that 56.7% of all respondents says to RELEASES THE DARN DOCUMENTS! This clearly shows what the WILL OF THE PEOPLE seem to indicate! But then again, when has Soetoro ever gone by the WILL OF THE PEOPLE?

4. Some states have drafted legislation requiring candidates for President to prove that they were born in the United States and also meet all other Constitutional requirements to be qualified to serve as President of the United States. Do you support or oppose such state legislation?

My Comment: Again, this indicates that all is not going well with Soetoro. This indicates that a super- majority (nearly 2/3) or 65.2% of all those who responded believed that it is the STATES responsibility to OVERSEE the federal election of the POTUS. Only 23.8% felt otherwise!

5. Generally speaking, do you think the United States is headed in the right direction, or is it off on the wrong track?

My Comment: Again, 65.4% believe that our country is headed on the wrong path? And even more devastating to Soetoro and his minions, is that 38.7% of Democrats do not believe Soetoro is on THE RIGHT TRACK. Soetoro cannot even get 50% from his own crowd! His cesspool is quickly draining...and he may be replacing LTC Terry Lakin in the Leavenworth Graybar Hotel, and Lakin can be President...and we can give out Soetoro's cell number instead.

See> (input Q2, Q3, etc for each additional question...)

Anyway, these are my comments. You and WND have done great in this whole matter. I am not complaining...just pointing out my observations!

Thanks again for your work and dedication,

Edward C. Noonan
2002 Candidate - Secretary of State (CA)
2006 Candidate - Governor (CA)
2010 Candidate - US Senate (CA)
2006-2008 State Party Chairman -
American Independent Party


No comments:

Post a Comment